Sport and Games Atlas

How The Game Is Played
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Game

Game of the Three Kingdoms

Chess-Family War Games

Game of the Three Kingdoms, known in Chinese as Sanguo Qi and also called Three Kingdoms Chess or Three-Handed Xiangqi, is a three-player variant of xiangqi, the game often called Chinese chess. Each of the three players commands a full xiangqi army standing for one of the rival states of the Three Kingdoms period, Wei, Shu and Wu, which contested control of China after the fall of the Han dynasty. The armies are drawn in blue, red and green, and each player may also use two optional extra pieces called bannermen that move like an extended horse. The board joins three xiangqi half-boards into a hexagonal shape, each retaining the traditional river. Checkmate follows xiangqi convention except that the mated general is removed and the player who delivered the mate takes over the defeated army, so the last surviving kingdom wins. The date of origin is disputed between the Southern Song and Qing dynasties, because the two original Chinese texts that described it are lost. The game reached Western readers through an 1876 report by O. von Moellendorff.

Facts
Sport
Game Type (category)
Board Game 1
Game Type (category)
Strategy Game 1
Classification
Player Count
Small Group (3-6 Players) 1
Connections

Derived From

Xiangqi, Games
Source Game of the Three Kingdoms (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Found In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.

Source Game of the Three Kingdoms (Wikipedia)Lead sentence
Quote, Lead sentence
is a three-player variant of the game xiangqi ("Chinese chess")
Sources
1. Game of the Three Kingdoms (Wikipedia)
  • Lead sentence
    is a three-player variant of the game xiangqi ("Chinese chess")
  • History, gameboard description
    Möllendorff depicts a hexagonal gameboard comprising three xiangqi half-boards
View the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.