Sport and Games Atlas

How The Game Is Played
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Game

Snip-snap-snorum

Matching and Shedding Card Games

Snip Snap Snorum is a traditional round game for four to eight players using a standard 52-card pack, in which each player tries to be the first to get rid of all their cards. Pagat describes the original form as a stops game related to Newmarket and Michigan, where cards are played in ascending sequence in suit, with each sequence limited to five cards and each card announced with a call: snip, snap, snorum, high cockalorum and jingo. A second version, favoured by more recent writers, has players play cards of equal rank instead. The game is recorded in British and German sources, and the German name was Schnipp-Schnapp-Schnurr-Burr-Basilorum. Pagat suggests that the habit of calling out the words when matching cards are played may have given rise to the children game Snap. Variants include Earl of Coventry and Nobble.

Facts
Classification
Player Count
Small Group (3-6 Players) 1
Player Count
Large Group or Variable 1
Sport
Game Type (category)
Card Game 1
In the Other Atlases

Found In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.

Source Pagat (John McLeod): Snip Snap SnorumRegion line, Britain
Quote, Region line, Britain
Region: Britain
Sources
1. Pagat (John McLeod): Snip Snap Snorum
  • Introduction
    Traditional round game for 4-8 players
  • Players, cards and deal
    The game is suitable for 4 to 8 players, each playing for themselves.
  • Region line, Britain
    Region: Britain
  • Introduction, summary line
    players try to get rid of their cards by playing them in ascending sequences of up to 5 cards in suit
  • Players, cards and deal, first sentence
    The game is suitable for 4 to 8 players, each playing for themselves.
  • Players, cards and deal, upper range of 8 players
    Traditional round game for 4-8 players
View the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.